Article Sidebar

Download
PDF
Statistic
Read Counter : 0 Download : 0

Main Article Content

Abstract

The fourth revolution of industrialization has enormously influenced the education sector and needs to be dynamic and sensible in light of the changeable requirements of employers. Specifically, higher education institutions (HEIs) must focus on the global labor market to offer an innovative curriculum and attract prospective students. One of the current trends in the higher education sector is to design interdisciplinary degree programs. The interdisciplinary master's degree program is relatively new in Mongolian tertiary education. Therefore, we aimed to identify the need for a master’s degree program in interdisciplinary studies in education from the perspective of prospective students and also determine the areas of studies that have been preferred in the field of education. In this study, two online surveys and a focused-group interview were conducted. Three hundred ten educators were involved in the online surveys and focused-group interviews. The research questions were created on Google form, data was collected electronically, and focused group interviews were conducted simultaneously. The findings indicated that 52% of the prospective students preferred a master’s degree program in interdisciplinary studies in education, and a diverse combination of areas has been demanded, in particular, education and modern teaching methodology (26.4%); teaching and linguistics (25.5%); education and international studies (23%) and, teaching and psychology (19.4%). The other important finding was that interdisciplinary studies would be able to provide the necessary knowledge and skills that make graduates competitive in the labor market.

Keywords

Interdisciplinary studies Interdisciplinary courses Prospective students Higher education institutions Skills gap

Article Details

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

How to Cite
Namjildorj, O. (2023). Expanding Demand for Master’s Degree Programs in Interdisciplinary Studies in Education in Mongolia. International Journal of Asian Education, 4(2), 88–97. https://doi.org/10.46966/ijae.v4i2.334

References

  1. A. Scott, R. (2014). The meaning of liberal education. On the Horizon, 22(1), 23–34. https://doi.org/10.1108/OTH-09-2013-0036
  2. Barry, A., Born, G., & Weszkalnys, G. (2008). Logics of interdisciplinarity. Economy and Society, 37(1), 20–49. https://doi.org/10.1080/03085140701760841
  3. Bishop-Williams, K. E., Roke, K., Aspenlieder, E., & Troop, M. (2017). Graduate Student Perspectives of Interdisciplinary and Disciplinary Programming for Teaching Development. The Canadian Journal for the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning, 8(3). https://doi.org/10.5206/cjsotl-rcacea.2017.3.11
  4. Boix Mansilla, Veronica., & Duraisingh, E. Dawes. (2007). Targeted Assessment of Students’ Interdisciplinary Work: An Empirically Grounded Framework Proposed. The Journal of Higher Education, 78(2), 215–237. https://doi.org/10.1353/jhe.2007.0008
  5. Bonvillian, G., & Murphy, R. (2014). The Liberal Arts College Adapting to Change. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315049915
  6. Bridle, H., Vrieling, A., Cardillo, M., Araya, Y., & Hinojosa, L. (2013). Preparing for an interdisciplinary future: A perspective from early-career researchers. Futures, 53, 22–32. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.futures.2013.09.003
  7. Brint, S. G., Turk-Bicakci, L., Proctor, K., & Murphy, S. P. (2009). Expanding the Social Frame of Knowledge: Interdisciplinary, Degree-Granting Fields in American Colleges and Universities, 1975-2000. 32(2), 155–183. http://higher-ed2000.ucr.edu/Publications/Brint%20et%20al%20(2008b).pdf
  8. Graybill, Jessica. K., Dooling, S., Shandas, V., Withey, J., Greve, A., & Simon, Gregory. L. (2006). A Rough Guide to Interdisciplinarity: Graduate Student Perspectives. Bioscience, 56(9), 757–763. www.biosciencemag.org
  9. Ho, H., & Hung, C. (2008). Marketing mix formulation for higher education. International Journal of Educational Management, 22(4), 328–340. https://doi.org/10.1108/09513540810875662
  10. Holdsworth, D. K., & Nind, D. (2006). Choice Modeling New Zealand High School Seniors’ Preferences for University Education. Journal of Marketing for Higher Education, 15(2), 81–102. https://doi.org/10.1300/J050v15n02_04
  11. Holley, K. A. (2017). Interdisciplinary Curriculum and Learning in Higher Education. In Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Education. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acrefore/9780190264093.013.138
  12. Holley, Karri. A. (2019). Learning from Klein: Examining Current Interdisciplinary Practices within U.S Higher Education. Issues in Interdisciplinary Studies, 37(2), 17–32. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1248670.pdf
  13. James Jacob, W. (2015). Interdisciplinary trends in higher education. Palgrave Communications, 1(1), 15001. https://doi.org/10.1057/palcomms.2015.1
  14. Lyall, C., & Meagher, L. R. (2012). A Masterclass in interdisciplinarity: Research into practice in training the next generation of interdisciplinary researchers. Futures, 44(6), 608–617. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.futures.2012.03.011
  15. Mitchell, P. H. (2005). What’s In A Name? Journal of Professional Nursing, 21(6), 332–334. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.profnurs.2005.10.009
  16. Nancarrow, S. A., Booth, A., Ariss, S., Smith, T., Enderby, P., & Roots, A. (2013). Ten principles of good interdisciplinary teamwork. Human Resources for Health, 11(1), 19. https://doi.org/10.1186/1478-4491-11-19
  17. Park, J.-Y., & Son, J.-B. (2010). Transitioning toward Transdisciplinary Learning in a Multidisciplinary Environment. International Journal of Pedagogies and Learning, 6(1), 82–93. https://doi.org/10.5172/ijpl.6.1.82
  18. QS. (2022). What do employers want from today’s graduates? Insights from the 2022 QS Global Employer Survey. http://hdl.voced.edu.au/10707/633363
  19. Rhoten, D., & Parker, A. (2004). Risks and Rewards of an Interdisciplinary Research Path. Science, 306(5704), 2046–2046. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1103628
  20. Rudall, B. H., & Espejo, R. (2011). Research and development: current impact and future potential. Kybernetes, 40(3/4), 581–584. https://doi.org/10.1108/03684921111156651
  21. Rudall, B. H., & Mann, C. J. H. (2010). Perceptions of interdisciplinary research and developments. Kybernetes, 39(7), 1093–1096. https://doi.org/10.1108/03684921011062700
  22. Spelt, E. J. H., Biemans, H. J. A., Tobi, H., Luning, P. A., & Mulder, M. (2009). Teaching and Learning in Interdisciplinary Higher Education: A Systematic Review. Educational Psychology Review, 21(4), 365–378. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-009-9113-z
  23. Stember, M. (1991). Advancing the social sciences through the interdisciplinary enterprise. The Social Science Journal, 28(1), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1016/0362-3319(91)90040-B
  24. Tamtekin Aydın, O. (2015). University Choice Process: A Literature Review on Models and Factors Affecting the Process. Yuksekogretim Dergisi, 5(2), 103–111. https://doi.org/10.2399/yod.15.008
  25. Walsh, G., & Beatty, S. E. (2007). Customer-based corporate reputation of a service firm: scale development and validation. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 35(1), 127–143. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11747-007-0015-7